How to choose a lawyer to provide legal assistance? Who to trust and how to find out a specialist in your business?

The question is very difficult. Due to the fact that a person needs legal assistance, the person himself does not have special legal knowledge. And if this is so, it is easy for the client to splurge during the initial conversation to insert two or three legal terms, even if not in the topic, to make sure that the law is on your side: “Pay me and I will win this case for you. Unfortunately, the situation described is common. The choice of lawyer must be approached more carefully.

Consider some of the issues that need attention when choosing a representative, and arrange them in order of increasing importance, starting with the most insignificant.     

Education  

Personally, it seems to you that this is the most insignificant criterion. No, of course, the fact of having a legal education is obligatory. And some even pay attention to who graduated from a university, or maybe even consider a lawyer’s assessment, giving preference to graduates with a red diploma. The personal qualities of a successful lawyer such as James Lyle attorney Albuquerque imply more than simple memorization – this is the ability to find contact with a person (client, respondent, investigator, prosecutor, etc.), have stress tolerance, the ability to quickly navigate and make decisions immediately, during the trial, and so on.

Work experience

Work experience in the legal sphere as a whole improves the quality of a lawyer. But if a lawyer says that his experience is 10 years, this is also not the fact that he will carry out exactly your case. The representative should have experience in that direction, in the area of ​​law in which you need help. In addition, the lawyer is not liable, regardless of the outcome of the case. Being a specialist, for example, in criminal law, such a lawyer is unlikely to carry out a high-quality case on the eviction of his former spouse.

Success

This factor contains everything – education, experience and ability to communicate with the participants in the process, and everything else. If you are faced with the problem of division of property during a divorce, and a lawyer shows you the decisions of the courts, in which his name is indicated, and which are made in favor of his clients – this is the main argument in his favor. Of course, you cannot all row with one comb, and the cause of the case – strife. But the choice between a lawyer who previously successfully conducted cases like yours, and a lawyer who does not have such experience, is clearly in favor of the first.

Comments are closed.

  • Partner links